Last weekend I finally got a chance to see Avatar. The film had been delayed in China until January 2, and from what I hear about it, it’s unlikely that I would have been able to see it at that time, if I had tried (as it was I just waited until I was back in the states.
I’d already read a few reviews of it, both positive and negative, so I knew what to expect. The story was actually a bit better than I had thought from the reviews, but it was still very much suffering from the noble savage and white guilt tropes (those aren’t necessarily bad, though), and I do see why people have objected to the hero being a white American who not only assimilates into Na’vi culture but becomes better than them at everything they do in a very short time (the second bit is the key to the objection). However, I had to agree with my brother who mentioned the Avatar body as being “liberating” for the paraplegic protagonist.
I was impressed by the depth of the world and the alienness of the creatures living there. The world of Pandora is beautifully rendered and at no time did I detect a flaw in the CGI — in fact, I didn’t even think about it most of the movie. Like others, I noticed the conspicuousness of the humanoid Na’vi on a planet where all other land animals have six limbs, a second pair of eyes, and breathing orifices on the underside of the body, particularly when much of the world uses realistic science to make fantastic landscapes (those floating mountains are not magical in the least). I do, however, think it is a good alien design for the purpose — there are a few things that will take people out of their comfort zone (the neural link takes on a whole different meaning when you find it not only links to other animals, but is also used during mating — though in my mind it makes it more plausible as far as evolution goes).
Plus, too much alienness in the Na’vi could have messed with one of the reasons I saw the movie: the language. I’ve tried creating languages, or conlanging, a bit myself, and when I had read that a linguist consultant was hired to construct the language I knew I wanted to see the movie, and I think this language could possibly achieve its goal of “out-Klingon Klingon”. I have tried to find as much information about it ever since. The consultant, Paul Frommer posted a sketch of the language at Language Log, and I know of a fan site that is trying to make sense of what materials have come out. Certain bits of the romanization (which I hear were decided from above) irk me, (x marks ejectives when ‘ is being used for the glottal stop?) but I do think that the language has a beautiful sound to fit the beauty of the Na’vi while still being somewhat unconventional. I would like someday to see a developed constructed language for aliens that actually used some non-human sounds, but I can understand Cameron’s desire for actors to perform their lines without manipulation. In any case, don’t be surprised if you hear me calling someone a “skxawng” (if I can get the pronunciation down, that is 😛 ).




I like neither na’vi nor klingon as the future global language. Especially when you have to dress up for it 😀
We also need a future international language. One which is easy to learn, as well !
And that’s not English! Esperanto? Certainly yes!
Have a look at http://www.lernu.net
I think it’s important to point out that Na’vi and Klingon are much different from Esperanto. The former two are what the conlanging community call artistic languages, or artlangs, and are used to give verisimilitude to a fictional world, with no intention of having a serious impact on the real world.
Esperanto is an International Auxiliary Language, also called an IAL or auxlang. It is specifically designed to become a culturally-neutral lingua franca. There have been several iterations of auxlangs and all have failed to achieve the status of powerful languages like English or Chinese. This isn’t because of design flaws (though I would argue that Esperanto, while fairly easy to learn, is harder than it could have been), it’s because to become an international language you need economic power, and that’s something that no auxlang has achieved. Esperanto can be credited as the most successful with around 200,000 speakers, but that puts it pretty far down the ladder than many Esperantists would like.
When evaluating language it’s important to take these issues into account. Artlangs like Na’vi and Klingon need to be judged on realism, originality, completeness, and subjective measures like phonaesthetics (general sound of the language). Auxlangs, even though unlikely to succeed, could be judged on ease of learning (by a variety of speech communities) and flexibility in creating new vocabulary. Esperanto does fairly well as an auxlang, but wouldn’t be so cool as an artlang. Conversely, Na’vi is a wonderful artlang, but would fail as an auxlang because of its complexity.
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by gacorley: Posted this yesterday but forgot to tweet it: a little review of Avatar http://wp.me/ss1pw-avatar…